With the best pheromones

With the best pheromones there is no obvious benefit to the attraction of the female endocrine system. Pheromones for men did not have an effect on cycle length. What really seems to matter is the company she keeps When I evaluated the records that asked women about the frequency of their pheromone experience of genital stimulation in the presence of a man—not necessarily by a man—there was an effect on cycle length. Pheromone attraction in its popular sense—an act performed alone—has no positive effect on cycle length. In fact it was no different than celibacy. Learn more at http://astrobiosociety.org/pheromones-sexual-odors/ Sexual stimulation of pheromones by a man or with a man present does affect cycle length. A time to embrace requires a partner. The science of intimacy is teaching us that an intimate partner provides some critical “essence” that a woman cannot provide for herself. Consider the implications of this pheromone discovery. Throughout recent history, with the exception of the permissive seventies and eighties, women were counseled by their mothers and grandmothers to retain their virginity until they married. My pheromone results suggest that the old advice was probably good. Coupled to a romantic relationship, plenty of petting would pro- mote the fertility cycles of a woman without jeopardizing her future fertility. The point is not whether data like these will compel women to go back to the standard of their grandmothers; the point is that those standards promoted, in many different ways, endocrine health and well- being while they preserved the viability of the next generation. CONCLUSIONS This chapter has covered a good deal of ground. It has introduced an important idea———that the poetry of intimacy has an underlying scientific research. Bach study participant marked one of the four boxes each day. An A if there was no behavior, an S for genital stimulation, an M for masturbation, and C for coitus. Menstrual flow was also recorded. Learn more at https://jail6letter.wordpress.com/2015/08/28/pheromones-that-worked-for-me/These calendars provided the raw data. In true “double-blind” fashion my research assistants could llbulate and analyze the data. The results allowed me to conclude that weekly sex in the presence of I man was closely associated with the fertile 29.5-day cycle. The presence of a man seemed to be just good as intercourse in producing the pheromone cycle length. The term double-blind has a very specific meaning to scientific investigators. It means that neither Ihl person who is evaluating the data not the person who is the subject of the data knows what the hypothesis of the research study is. Double-blind studies help to inhibit the possibility that, unintentionally. the research result will “work out” in the direction expected. By having research assistants and analyze the pheromone data that subjects provide. a good scientific investigator protects herself from unwittingly misintetpreting the data she is recording. From the 1977 study onward all of my research studies involved this ”arm‘s length“ process because. ‘by then I knew. in attempting to replicate the pheromones. Learn more at http://pheromones-work.weebly.com/home/long-range-pheromone-mating-orientation

Comments are closed.